July 18,2025 –Motion : Review of Traffic Safety and Speed Violations Near School Zones
Date Introduced: July 18, 2025
Moved By: Councillor Cindy Gilroy
Current Status:
Introduced and under review.
The motion is currently pending referral to the appropriate Standing Policy Committee (likely Public Works and Infrastructure) for further study and recommendation. City staff will be tasked with gathering data and preparing a detailed report.
Description:
This motion directs the City of Winnipeg to conduct a data-driven review of traffic safety near school zones, with a focus on areas that have high volumes of speeding tickets—especially those enforced by third-party contractors.
The goal is to move beyond enforcement alone and ensure these areas are structurally safe, not simply financially penalized.
Key priorities include:
- Evaluating if school zones have adequate signage, crosswalks, lighting, and speed indicators
- Identifying areas where repeated speeding tickets suggest infrastructure failures, not just driver behavior
- Recommending physical safety improvements such as curb extensions, speed bumps, and enhanced visibility measures
- Exploring how ticket revenues might be reinvested into local road safety upgrades
Intended Outcome:
Ensure that enforcement is matched with real, equitable infrastructure upgrades to keep children, families, and pedestrians safer in school zones citywide. This motion puts prevention and design first, ensuring enforcement is not the only tool used to reduce traffic dangers around schools.
July 17, 2025 –Protecting Public Spaces for Children and Families
Title: Protecting Public Spaces for Children and Families (scheduled review in September 2025)
Date: July 17, 2025
Description:
In July 2025, I introduced a motion to prohibit encampments in spaces designed for children and families such as playgrounds, spray pads, pools, community centres, and community gardens. This motion was in response to increasing reports of hazardous materials like needles and fentanyl packaging found in areas where children play. While we continue to respect federal requirements that encampments can’t be removed without appropriate housing, the City has a duty to keep high-risk public spaces safe. This motion directs city staff and outreach teams to prioritize these areas, ensuring our kids have clean, safe spaces to grow and play.
Status:
- Introduced at City Council on July 17, 2025
- Referred to the Community Services Committee for consideration
- Scheduled for review in September 2025
What Happens Next:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Committee Review | The Community Services Committee will hear the motion in September 2025. Delegations may be allowed to speak for or against it. |
| 2. Possible Amendments | Councillors on the committee may suggest changes or additions based on public feedback or legal considerations. |
| 3. Vote at Committee | If passed at committee, it will move to the Executive Policy Committee (EPC) or straight to City Council depending on the procedural path. |
| 4. Final Council Decision | The full City Council will debate and vote on the final version of the motion. If passed, it becomes City policy and is implemented by the public service. |
July 3, 2025 –Time Limits on Vacant Buildings(Daniel McIntyre Ward)
Title: Motion to Address Long-Term Vacant Homes (the motion is under consideration)
Date: July 3, 2025
Description:
Councillor Cindy Gilroy introduced a motion at the City Centre Community Committee calling for stronger action on residential properties that have remained vacant for over three years without efforts to sell, rent, or rehabilitate them. The motion directs the Winnipeg Public Service to study stricter tools such as forced rehabilitation, temporary public use, or municipal expropriation. It also requests a legal review and consultation with other cities. The goal is to return neglected properties to active use and support housing needs in neighbourhoods like Daniel McIntyre.
Current Status:
- The motion has been formally introduced and discussed at the City Centre Community Committee.
- It is now under active review by the committee.
- There are no public updates yet on whether it has been referred to other committees or scheduled for a vote or report.
Next Steps:
- Committee Deliberation
- The City Centre Community Committee will continue reviewing the motion, potentially inviting delegations or stakeholder feedback.
- Public Service Report
- City staff may be asked to prepare a report detailing:
- What other cities do
- Legal frameworks for enforcement
- Cost and timeline estimates for rehabilitation or expropriation measures
- City staff may be asked to prepare a report detailing:
- Committee Vote
- After review and discussion, the committee will vote on whether to forward the motion to the Executive Policy Committee (EPC) or directly to City Council.
- EPC / Council Consideration
- If referred, the EPC evaluates financial and policy impacts before passing recommendations to Council.
- Council would then debate and vote; if approved, enforcement tools would be developed and prioritized provincially.
- Implementation Phase
- Upon Council approval, the City would implement the policy issuing orders, launching rehabilitation efforts, or proceeding with expropriation where necessary.
July 3, 2025 – Construction Waste Diversion Strategy
Title: Construction Waste Diversion Strategy ( “under review”)
Date: July 3, 2025
Description: Councillor Cindy Gilroy introduced a motion at the City Centre Community Committee meeting to develop a construction and demolition waste diversion strategy for Winnipeg. The motion calls on the City to review best practices, collaborate with the Climate Action and Resilience Committee, and explore regulatory tools to reduce landfill waste and emissions from construction. A full report with recommendations is expected within 180 days.
Current Status:
- The motion has been formally introduced before City Centre Community Committee.
- It is currently under consideration by the committee.
- There’s no public indication yet of referral to additional committee(s) or an exact hearing/report date.
What Happens Next:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Committee Review | The City Centre Community Committee will review the motion and determine next steps either advancing it, requesting reports, or referring to another Standing Policy Committee (likely Environment, or Public Works & Infrastructure). |
| 2. Public Service Report | Per motion direction, the public service has up to 180 days (i.e., by late December 2025) to submit a report outlining best practices, policy proposals, and regulatory tools. |
| 3. Committee Deliberation & Vote | Once the report is received, committee members will review findings, potentially amend the strategy, and vote to move it forward to the Executive Policy Committee (EPC) or directly to Council. |
| 4. EPC & Council Review | The EPC will assess broader policy and funding implications before sending the motion to City Council for final debate and vote. |
| 5. Implementation | If approved by Council, the strategy will be integrated into City planning and by-law development, with oversight by relevant departments and committees. |
Key Deadlines & Dates:
- Report due by: ~December 29, 2025 (180-day deadline)
- Committee review: Expected in Fall 2025 after report delivery
- Council decision: Likely in early 2026, pending committee schedules
Motion Title: Demolition Site Debris Cleanup & Cost Recovery
Date Introduced: June 26, 2025
Moved By: Councillor Cindy Gilroy
Current Status:
Introduced and under administrative review.
The motion was presented at the June 26, 2025 Council meeting and is currently awaiting referral to the appropriate Standing Policy Committee—likely Property and Development or Water, Waste & Environment—for analysis and recommendations.
City staff are expected to prepare a report on implementation mechanisms, enforcement procedures, and tax recovery processes for property owners who fail to clean up after demolition.
Description:
This motion aims to ensure demolished properties are cleaned up quickly and properly. When private property owners fail to remove leftover debris and rubble after demolitions, the City would:
- Step in to conduct the cleanup
- Add the cost of that work to the property owner’s tax bill
- Improve safety, cleanliness, and neighbourhood aesthetics
- Prevent abandoned sites from attracting dumping, pests, or vandalism
Goal:
To create clear accountability for demolition debris and uphold standards of health, safety, and pride across Winnipeg neighbourhoods.
June 26, 2025 — Expanding Access and Equity at Sherbrook Pool
Motion: Expanding Access and Equity at Sherbrook Pool
- Date Introduced: June 26, 2025
- Moved By: Councillor Cindy Gilroy
- Goal:
- Reduce weight room and fitness fees at Sherbrook Pool
- Bring pricing in line with Freight House Recreation Centre
- Monitor usage trends to ensure equitable and increased access for the local community
Current Status:
- The motion was introduced at City Council on June 26, 2025
- It was then referred to the Community Services Committee for review
- As of now, the motion is awaiting committee consideration, likely to be scheduled for discussion in late summer or fall 2025
What Happens Next:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Committee Hearing | The Community Services Committee will hear the motion. Residents may delegate (speak in support). |
| 2. Staff Input | Committee may request a cost analysis or operational report on impacts to revenue, usage, or programming. |
| 3. Committee Vote | After reviewing feedback and any reports, the committee will vote on whether to recommend the fee reduction. |
| 4. Council Vote | If approved, the motion proceeds to City Council for a final vote and implementation direction. |
| 5. Monitoring | If passed, the City will track usage stats and report back on whether reduced fees improved access and equity. |
Summary Table
| Motion | Status |
|---|---|
| Fee reduction at Sherbrook Pool | Referred to Community Services Committee |
| Goal | Lower barriers to fitness access in core communities |
| Review Timeline | Expected fall 2025 |
| Final Decision | Pending committee and Council vote |
June 26, 2025 — “Honouring Lives, Learning Lessons, and Committing to Action”
At Council on June 26, I brought forward a motion in response to the tragic murders of Morgan Harris, Marcedes Myran, Rebecca Contois, and the woman known as Buffalo Woman. These were beloved community members, not statistics. The search of Prairie Green Landfill is about dignity and justice. We must act not just to bring these women home, but to change how we respond to missing and murdered Indigenous women, girls, and 2SLGBTQIA+ people. This motion calls for coordinated action, clear protocols, and a commitment to never look away again.
Current Status:
- The motion has been officially presented at Council, but it has not yet advanced to a Standing Policy Committee or the Executive Policy Committee.
- No clear referral or committee review has been reported publicly; neither has an expected timeline for reports or recommendations been announced
What Happens Next:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Committee Referral | Motion is typically sent to a Standing Policy Committee (likely Community Services or the Indigenous Relations Committee) for review |
| Public Service Report | City Administration prepares a report detailing next steps, timelines, and resource implications |
| Committee Deliberation | The committee reviews the report, possibly suggests amendments, and votes to move it to Executive or Council |
| EPC & Council Review | Final debate and decision at Executive Policy Committee and/or City Council |
May 15,2025 – Motion: Review Winnipeg Transit Plus Eligibility Criteria
Date Introduced: May 15, 2025 (City Council; proposed by Councillor Gilroy)
Current Status:
- The motion has been formally introduced and referred to the Standing Policy Committee on Public Works & Infrastructure.
- Winnipeg Transit’s recent updates show active service improvements (e.g. On‑Request expansion from June 2025)
- Transit Plus eligibility remains based on criteria such as wheelchair/scooter use, inability to walk 175 m, visual impairment, or Alzheimer’s/dementia
- Internal review underway: Council directed Transit Plus staff to evaluate whether criteria should be expanded, reflect winter accessibility challenges, or include conditional eligibility (e.g. ability to use conventional service some days)
Next Steps:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Staff Assessment | Transit Plus administration is reviewing modern best practices (peer cities like Toronto), the Accessibility for Manitobans Act, no-show data, and conditional eligibility models |
| 2. Committee Discussion | Public Works Committee will host a hearing including potential delegations from transit users based on the findings. |
| 3. Policy Decision & Recommendation | The Committee may propose updates (e.g., conditional eligibility, reassessment timelines, expanded criteria) and forward them as recommendations. |
| 4. EPC & Council Review | The Executive Policy Committee and/or Council will vote to update eligibility policy. |
| 5. Implementation Changes | Transit Plus will adopt revised eligibility frameworks updating applications, assessments, and eligibility periods. |
Summary
- Introduced: May 15, 2025
- Referred to: Public Works & Infrastructure Committee
- Staff Review: In progress (best practices, legislation, rider needs)
- Policy Updates: Expected following committee review and public input
April 2025 – Motion to Sign the Montreal Pledge
In April 2025, Councillor Cindy Gilroy introduced a motion urging the City of Winnipeg to sign the Montreal Pledge, a commitment to stronger environmental action, transparent emissions tracking, and long-term urban sustainability. By adopting this pledge, the city would join other municipalities across Canada in taking measurable steps toward climate resilience, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and supporting greener urban planning. The motion emphasized Winnipeg’s responsibility to lead by example in addressing climate change and building a more sustainable future for current and future generations.
Current Status:
- The motion has been introduced and likely referred to the Water, Waste & Environment Committee in line with prior processes seen in 2023 when a similar biodiversity/pledge motion progressedtreespleasewinnipeg.com.
- However, no new updates are available publicly indicating:
- If the pledge has already been signed by the City,
- Whether the motion advanced through committee,
- Or any pending report or recommendation.
What Happens Next:
- Committee Review
- The motion is examined by the Water, Waste & Environment (WWE) Committee, including technical evaluation and potential amendments.
- Public Service Report
- A report is produced detailing:
- Emissions-tracking frameworks,
- Environmental strategies aligned with the pledge’s 15 points,
- Timeline and resource feasibility.
- A report is produced detailing:
- Committee Vote
- WWE Committee votes on whether to recommend Council support the pledge.
- Council Decision
- If recommended, the full City Council votes, and Winnipeg formally signs and adopts the Montreal Pledge.
- Implementation
- City administration begins integrating pledge actions into policies, sustainability targets, and governance practices.
March 28, 2025 – Motion to Expropriate Lemay Forest
At the March 28, 2025 City Council meeting, Councillor Cindy Gilroy introduced a motion to immediately move forward with the expropriation of Lemay Forest. This 18-acre river bottom forest in St. Norbert is one of the last intact riparian ecosystems within Winnipeg and holds significant environmental, cultural, and historical value. The motion aimed to preserve the land from development and protect its biodiversity, as well as honour the history of the former Asile Ritchot orphanage and possible unmarked graves on-site. Despite overwhelming community support and compelling presentations from residents and historians, the motion was laid over by the majority of Council, with Councillor Gilroy being one of the only members to vote in favour of immediate action.
Current Update (as of April–June 2025)
- Council Tabled the Motion: On March 28, the motion was not advanced; instead, it was deferred without further debate.
- Province Declares Intent to Intervene:
- On April 14, 2025, Premier Wab Kinew publicly announced that the Province of Manitoba intends to expropriate the land to create a provincial park.
- Heritage Winnipeg confirmed formal expropriation plans were underway through provincial action, signaling cross-government interest.
- Stopping the Tree-Clearing:
- Following the provincial announcement, the municipal board upheld Winnipeg’s prior development rejection, and tree-clearing at the site was temporarily paused pending clarity around expropriation and heritage protections.
Next Steps & What Comes Next
| Level | Action Needed | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Provincial | File formal expropriation legislation and offer market-value compensation. | Province of Manitoba |
| Amending Municipal Role | Collaborate with Winnipeg to rezone and develop site planning (e.g., park boundaries, access). | City & Province |
| Heritage/Cultural Assessment | Province to initiate heritage and cemetery impact studies as proposed March 27. | Provincew/ City input savelemayforest.ca+1Heritage Winnipeg+1manitoba.catreespleasewinnipeg.com |
| Public Engagement | Host consultations on park features, cultural interpretation, and site stewardship. | Province & City |
| Implementation | Secure the land, commence rezoning, park conversion, and ongoing conservation measures. | Joint City‑Province partnership |
Summary
The original City Council motion to immediately expropriate the Lemay Forest was tabled on March 28. However, the issue has gained significant traction: by mid-April, the Province of Manitoba announced its intention to expropriate the land and develop a provincial park. This shifting dynamic effectively supersedes municipal proceedings, and the focus now falls on provincial action including formal expropriation steps, funding, and long-term stewardship.
February 2025 – Proactive Public Safety in Parks
In February 2025, Councillor Cindy Gilroy brought forward a motion focused on improving safety in Winnipeg’s public parks by calling for a coordinated and proactive city response to the removal of needle debris and weapons. The motion aimed to ensure that parks remain welcoming, safe spaces for families, children, and all residents to enjoy. By addressing these safety concerns head-on, the intent was to reduce harm and increase public confidence in using green spaces across the city. The motion highlighted the importance of ongoing maintenance, quick response times, and interdepartmental collaboration to keep parks clean and secure year-round.
Current Status:
- The motion has been formally introduced and discussed by Councillor Gilroy.
- It has not yet been referred to a Standing Policy Committee in any public records.
- No public update has been released detailing whether a report has been requested or scheduled.
- Historically, similar motions (e.g. in 2024) were referred to the Community Services Committee,
What Happens Next:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Committee Referral | Expected to be directed to the Community Services Committee or another relevant committee such as Public Works & Parks. |
| 2. Public Service Report | City staff will need to prepare a report outlining current safety protocols, staffing levels, frequency of park sweeps, and potential policy tools. |
| 3. Committee Review & Vote | Committee will review the report, potentially amend the motion, and vote on whether to send it to the Executive Policy Committee (EPC) or City Council. |
| 4. EPC/Council Decision | If recommended, EPC will assess funding implications before the full City Council debates and votes. |
| 5. Implementation | Upon approval, increased patrols, enhanced maintenance protocols, and coordinated outreach interventions will be deployed across parks. |
January 30, 2025 – Community-Focused Budget Amendment
During the final 2025 City of Winnipeg budget vote on January 30, 2025, Councillor Cindy Gilroy introduced an amendment aimed at funding “Community Connections” services. This proposal was intended to strengthen frontline supports that connect residents with vital community resources such as housing, mental health support, and crisis intervention. The amendment reflected a growing need for wraparound services that address social challenges through prevention and early response. Unfortunately, the motion was defeated and did not make it into the final approved budget, despite its focus on supporting vulnerable residents and improving quality of life at the neighbourhood level.
Status:
- The amendment was formally presented during the budget process.
- It received Council consideration but was defeated and not included in the final approved budget
What Comes Next:
- Community Support & Advocacy
- Residents and advocates (including Make Poverty History Manitoba) may continue to lobby Council or the Province to reinstate funding.
- Alternative Funding Strategies
- Councillor Gilroy might explore alternative funding sources such as provincial grants or reallocation within the City budget to revive Community Connections.
- Budget Cycle Opportunity
- The 2026 budget process (starting late 2025) will be the next opportunity to reintroduce this amendment or secure funding through other motions.
- Partnerships with Institutions
- Potential collaboration with Winnipeg Library, non-profits, or provincial agencies to sustain the service independently of City funding.
Summary
| Aspect | Status |
|---|---|
| Introduced | Yes |
| Council vote | Defeated |
| Funding secured? | No |
| Next opportunity | 2026 budget cycle or alternate pathways |
March,2025 – Garbage Fee Reduction
April 2024 – Motion for Pilot Project: Garbage Pickup at Homeless Encampments
In April 2024, Councillor Cindy Gilroy proposed a pilot project to introduce regular garbage pickup at homeless encampments throughout Winnipeg. The motion was designed to address growing concerns around environmental health, safety, and the dignity of all residents, housed and unhoused alike. Recognizing the complex challenges these sites present, the proposal emphasized collaboration with frontline organizations such as Main Street Project, Siloam Mission, and the Downtown Community Safety Partnership. The goal was to reduce waste buildup, improve sanitation, and support a cleaner, more respectful urban environment through compassionate and coordinated action.
Pilot Evaluation & Report
- A report on outcomes, costs, partnerships, and recommendations was due in November 2024
- Key findings:
- Over 3,880 gallons of garbage removed in the first month alone
- Visual improvements were noted, though long-term cleanliness remained debated
Council Decision
- On January 30, 2025, City Council officially voted to end the pilot program, concluding the weekly cleanup service.
- Future cleanups will revert to as-needed basis under standard operations
What Happens Next
- As-Needed Cleanups Continue
- Public Works will handle waste removal based on complaints or safety needs going forward.
- Strategic Review (Possibly by City Staff)
- Administration may analyze pilot data to advise whether to resubmit or embed the service with modifications.
- Ongoing Outreach & Collaboration
- Non-profits will persist in engagement and support at encampment sites.
- Re-submission Opportunity
- The pilot model could be revived or modified for a future EPC/Council consideration based on budget cycles or emerging needs.
- Integration with Provincial Efforts
- The Province’s housing and homelessness initiatives (e.g., Your Way Home) may now take primary responsibility for encampment supports
Motion:
- Date Introduced: March 2025
- Proposed By: Councillor Cindy Gilroy (Daniel McIntyre), supported by Councillor Brian Mayes (St. Vital)
- Proposal: Add 1% to the property tax increase (raising it from 5.95% to 6.95%) to reduce the proposed garbage fee hike from $100 to $50. The goal was to ease the burden on lower-income households by spreading costs through taxation rather than flat fees.
Status: Defeated
- The motion was not supported by the Executive Policy Committee (EPC) or the Mayor.
- It was not adopted in the 2025 budget, which was finalized and passed by City Council on March 27, 2025.
- Council approved the full garbage fee hike, increasing the annual residential garbage fee from $157 to $254 per household.
What Happens Next:
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| Short Term | Residents will begin paying the higher garbage fees as passed in the 2025 budget. |
| 2026 Budget Opportunity | Councillor Gilroy or others may reintroduce a similar motion in the 2026 budget cycle. |
| Charter Reform | Conversations continue around enabling the city to tie garbage fees to property values or income brackets, which would require provincial changes to the City of Winnipeg Charter. |
| Public Advocacy | Community groups may continue lobbying for more equitable cost-sharing options for essential city services like waste collection. |
Summary Table
| Motion | Status | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| March 2025 Garbage Fee Reduction | Defeated | Council approved full $254 garbage fee |
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Pilot Approved | April 16, 2024 |
| Pilot Period | June/October 2024 |
| Report Submitted | November 2024 |
| Council Vote to End Pilot | January 30, 2025 |
| Cleanups Return to Standard Operations | Ongoing |
March,2025 – Leaf and Yard Waste Collection
Motion: In-House Leaf & Yard Waste Collection
- Introduced: March 2025
- Purpose: Transition some or all of the City’s leaf and yard waste collection services from private contractors to an in-house model, aiming for improved oversight, reliability, and cost efficiency.
Current Status
- The City’s Water, Waste & Environment (WWE) Committee commissioned a cost analysis report on in-house versus contracted services.
- Released in June 2025, the report indicates that starting with just the downtown area, transitioning in-house would cost an estimated $8.9 million over 7 years, significantly higher than the current contracting setup
- Following release:
- The motion remains under active review, but no Council decision has been made.
- The WWE Committee is now evaluating whether any part of the service is suitable for insourcing and exploring hybrid models.
What Happens Next
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Committee Discussion | WWE Committee will review the report possibly organizing a briefing session and inviting delegations to speak for or against in-house collection. |
| 2. Motion Revisions | Councillor Gilroy and colleagues may amend the motion, limiting the scope, phase-ins, or introducing pilot areas to reduce cost impact. |
| 3. Committee Decision | WWE Committee will vote on whether to forward recommendations to the Executive Policy Committee (EPC) or directly to full Council. |
| 4. EPC & Council Review | Broader policy examination, including budget impacts and comparisons with private contracting. |
| 5. Final Decision & Implementation | If approved, the City will begin phasing in in-house services, possibly starting with one zone. Otherwise, maintain the current contracted approach or adjust agreements. |
Early 2025 -Occupancy permits for garage bins are required for Multi-Family Properties.
Motion Overview
- Introduced: Early 2025 (details on Cindy Gilroy’s official motions page)
- Summary: Requires multi‑family residential properties to obtain occupancy permits for garage bins (i.e., communal bins or enclosed waste areas), ensuring they comply with safety, accessibility, and regulatory standards. Targets improved oversight and asset management within shared residences
Current Status
- The motion has been formally introduced, though specific dates and the council meeting remain unclear.
- There are no public records yet showing referral to a Standing Policy Committee, staff report requests, or scheduled review dates.
- City staff are likely preparing a feasibility report to outline:
- Regulatory requirements for occupancy permits
- Inspection processes and responsible departments
- Administrative or fee-based workflow
Next Steps
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Staff Report | Administration will study existing occupancy permit systems and evaluate how garage-bin oversight could be integrated. |
| 2. Committee Referral | Once the report is ready, the motion will be assigned to a relevant committee (likely Water, Waste & Environment, Planning, or Public Works) for discussion and preliminary vote. |
| 3. Committee Deliberation | The committee may hold hearings with delegations (property managers, residents) before voting. |
| 4. EPC and Council Review | If recommended, the motion will move to EPC and then to City Council for final decision and possible fee or permit requirements implementation. |
| 5. Roll-Out & Compliance | If adopted, a timeline will be established for multi-family properties to apply for occupancy permits, pay associated fees, and undergo inspections or reviews. |
Current Position
- Introduced and under initial analysis
- Awaiting staff due diligence and formal committee assignment
- No scheduled review or decision timeline yet
Streamlined demolitions reduce fire risk, vandalism, and community blight.
Stronger accountability: requiring cleanup ensures that problematic properties don’t become long-term hazards.
January 30, 2025 – Community Connections Funding
Date Introduced: January 30, 2025
Context: Introduced as a budget amendment during the final vote on Winnipeg’s 2025 operating budget
Purpose:
To fund “Community Connections,” a program designed to provide wraparound supports such as housing assistance, crisis intervention, mental health outreach, and resource navigation—especially for vulnerable residents.
Current Status:
- The motion was debated at Council but was ultimately defeated.
- It was not included in the final 2025 city budget passed on January 30, 2025.
- As a result, no city funding was allocated to initiate or continue the Community Connections program this year.
- The Mayor and the Executive Policy Committee did not endorse the amendment, and there was limited majority support from other councillors during the vote.
What Could Happen Next:
| Step | Possibility |
|---|---|
| 1. Reintroduction in 2026 Budget | Councillor Gilroy may submit a renewed funding motion in the 2026 budget cycle. |
| 2. Seek Alternate Funding | Partnerships or grant opportunities (provincial/federal) could be explored to launch the program outside of city budget constraints. |
| 3. Community Advocacy | Residents and support organizations can advocate directly to council or the Mayor for renewed consideration. |
| 4. Pilot Partnership Model | A limited-scale pilot or collaboration with existing service hubs might demonstrate impact and justify future funding. |
Summary Table
| Motion | Status | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Community Connections Funding | Defeated | Not included in 2025 budget |
Motion: Investment Strategies for Aquatic Facilities
- Introduced: In 2025 (seen on Councillor Gilroy’s motions page)
- Purpose: Secure sustainable funding models to maintain, upgrade, and expand Winnipeg’s aquatic facilities, including exploring partnerships, leveraging provincial/federal support, and focusing on energy efficiency and accessibility
Current Status
- The motion has been formally submitted but has not yet appeared on any Standing Policy Committee agenda.
- No public service report or timeline has been scheduled.
- City staff are most likely preparing cost-benefit analyses, evaluating existing pool infrastructure needs, and identifying funding partners.
What Happens Next
| Step | Next Actions |
|---|---|
| 1. Staff Feasibility Report | Administration prepares report detailing infrastructure needs, cost estimates, and financing options (e.g., grants, public-private partnerships). |
| 2. Committee Referral | Once ready, the motion will be referred to a relevant committee, likely Community Services or Water, Waste & Environment, for formal consideration. |
| 3. Committee Deliberation | The committee may invite delegations (residents, swim clubs) before debating and deciding whether to endorse the motion. |
| 4. EPC & Council Review | If supported, the motion advances to the Executive Policy Committee and eventually to City Council for debate, potential amendment, and approval. |
| 5. Implementation Phase | Upon approval, capital plans will align with the motion’s objectives. New funding sources may be integrated into multi-year budgets, and facility upgrades or expansions initiated. |
✅ Summary
- Status: Pending staff analysis and committee assignment
- Timeline: Likely enters committee cycle in late 2025
- Outcome: Dependent on policy support, financial planning, and external funding availability
Feb/2024 – Proactive Cleanup of Needle Debris and Weapons in City Parks
Motion Overview
- Introduced in early 2024 (formally discussed in February 2024)
- Aimed to establish a standing policy for proactive removal of needles, weapons, and other hazards—especially near playgrounds, tot lots, daycares, and priority parks
Committee Review (Nov 2024)
- The Community Services Committee reviewed staff options:
- Option A: Daily cleanup staffing (April to October) at 36 priority parks – $193,704/year
- Option B: Extended staffing into winter – $262,884/year
- The committee took no action, opting to “receive as information” and defer to discussions with provincial public health partners and harm reduction groups
Pilot Launched
- A city crew pilot began recently to address backlogged needle debris—collecting hundreds of needles and at least 2 knives in its first days
What Happens Next
| Step | Next Action |
|---|---|
| 1. Continued Pilot | The pilot crew will evaluate effectiveness in reducing hazards across parks. |
| 2. Monitor & Report | Staff will track volumes of debris collected and prepare a report on feasibility and costs. |
| 3. Committee Re-Review | The Community Services Committee is expected to revisit the motionpotentially in early fall 2025 to determine whether to: |
- Fully fund and approve daily cleanup,
- Extend or expand the pilot, or
- Integrate the initiative into standard park maintenance budgets. |
| 4. Council Decision | If recommended by committee, the motion proceeds to City Council for formal adoption and budget allocation. |
Current Status
- Introduced: February 2024
- Under Review: Committee looked at options Nov 2024
- Pilot Program: Launched successfully in spring/summer 2025
- Pending: Formal update/report to committee, followed by a Council decision
Delegation of Authority Demolition permits for Vacant and derelict residential buildings.
Motion Overview
- Introduced: 2022 (but actively supported in recent years by Councillor Gilroy)
- Purpose:
- Empower the City to issue demolition permits automatically, without requiring public hearings, for vacant or derelict residential buildings.
- If the property owner fails to clean up debris afterward, the City is authorized to perform the cleanup and add the cost to the property’s tax bill.
- Streamlines the process to address safety hazards and blight without unnecessary procedural delays.
Current Status
- The motion has been introduced and discussed, with city staff preparing supporting analyses.
- Earlier versions of the motion stalled due to:
- Concerns over legal authority.
- The City’s preference to rely on contractors and concern over equipment/staff costs.
- As of mid-2025, no formal vote has been scheduled, and the motion has not yet moved forward to a Standing Policy Committee or Council decision.
What Happens Next
- Staff Feasibility Report
- City Administration must present detailed analysis of:
- Legal authority and liability implications.
- Costs of in-house debris removal vs contractor use.
- Potential by-law amendments to grant necessary authority.
- City Administration must present detailed analysis of:
- Committee Referral & Hearing
- The motion needs referral to a relevant Standing Policy Committee (likely Water, Waste & Environment or Public Works & Infrastructure).
- Committees will hold a hearing, allowing delegations, and formally vote to recommend action.
- Council Vote
- If a committee approves the motion, it is forwarded to Executive Policy Committee and/or City Council for final approval.
- Implementation Phase
- Upon approval, staff will:
- Authorize demolition permits for derelict buildings without public hearings.
- Conduct or oversee cleanup if owners fail.
- Recover costs via tax assessment.
- Monitor program effectiveness annually.
- Upon approval, staff will:
Garbage management in multi-family residential properties
In December 2022, I introduced a motion to address garbage management in multi-family residential properties. This initiative requires private landlords to develop comprehensive garbage management plans and provide appropriate waste bins for tenants. The goal is to ensure timely garbage collection and efficient bulky waste removal, thereby maintaining cleanliness and hygiene in our communities.
Additionally, in April 2024, I proposed a pilot project for regular garbage pickup at homeless encampments. This project aims to address environmental, health, and safety concerns associated with waste accumulation in these areas. By collaborating with organizations like Main Street Project, Siloam Mission, and the Downtown Community Safety Partnership, we strive to maintain cleanliness and safety for all residents.
These initiatives reflect my commitment to improving waste management practices and ensuring a cleaner, safer environment for everyone in our community.
